PDA

View Full Version : Nikon 300mm F/4 Af-s Review


mikench
25-09-2005, 01:04 PM
http://i.pbase.com/v3/82/590082/1/49598602.300mmUploadDSC_6184.jpg


GETTING ACQUAINTED:

What’s in the Box:
The lens comes with the same nylon carrying case (CL-M2) as the 70-200mm f/2.8G AFS VR. My case stays in storage and never sees any use. The lens also comes with a removable tripod collar (more on this later) and the standard Nikon front and back caps. Of course, the manual is included.

Cosmetics:
The 300mm f4 AFS came with the nice crinkle finish found on all of Nikon’s newer high end lenses. This texture gives it a really good feel and may, although negligibly so, improve one’s grip on the lens. Nikon calls this a “simulated leather finish”.

The diameter of the lens barrel is noticeably larger than the 300mm f/4 AF. It looks a lot less like a lead pipe or a piece of plumbing too. As nice as this may sound, this fact also means taking up more space in your camera bag.
http://i.pbase.com/v3/82/590082/1/49598598.300mmUploadDSC_6161.jpg

Where’s the Rear Lens Element?
I was shocked when I removed the rear lens cap and peered into the lens. There was no rear element to be found! The first thing you see when peering behind the lens is the aperture. After the aperture is the last lens element. Interesting design there, which worries me about damaging the delicate aperture blades. However the aperture is deeply recessed beyond the reach of stray fingers so it should be pretty safe. Still, I would think twice about trying to clean the rear lens element should the need arise.
http://i.pbase.com/v3/82/590082/1/49598600.300mmUploadDSC_6172.jpg

FEATURES:

Hood:
Just like its older brother, the 300mm AFS comes with a built-in hood. The hood snaps into place when in its retracted position. When extended, the hood is secured by twisting it until it tightens to the lens front end.

Tripod Collar:
Having used the 70-200mm f/2.8 AFS VR and its wonderfully crafted collar, I could perfectly understand the countless gripes 300mm f4 AFS owners had about the one on their lens. I wouldn’t label it as total crap, nor would I say that it’s great either.

Stability issues apart, which I will leave to the experts to measurebate over, the rotating action of the tripod collar isn’t smooth by any means. It does not feel damped like the 70-200mm. Instead it feels like the coarseness of metal rolling on metal.

Kirk makes a tripod collar replacement called the NC-300 which will set you back a good $150 excluding shipping. I read that it’s an excellent substitute. But considering the fact that I rarely shoot outdoors with a tripod I don’t think I can justify splurging on a replacement.

77mm Filters!
“No more drop-in filters!” exclaim those who have stepped up from the 300mm f4 AF. I think it’s wonderful indeed that the AFS version is compatible with the standard filter diameter for most pro-grade lenses. But other than maybe a protective UV filter from time to time, I don’t see myself using filters on this lens. Maybe a polarizer, but then again that would be really rare.

Thumb Switches:
The 300mm f4 AFS comes with two switches conveniently placed on the left hand side of the lens where ones thumb would normally be.
i) M/A and M switch:
-This switch turns on and off the Silent Wave motor. Helps you save battery juice too.
ii) Focus limiter switch:
-This enables you to limit your AF range between infinity to 3m. This improves AF speed and reduces hunting too.

http://i.pbase.com/v3/82/590082/1/49598599.300mmUploadDSC_6168.jpg

Pseudo Macro:
One of the biggest selling points of this lens is its close focusing capability. This lens focuses down to 1.45m giving a reproduction ratio of 1:3.7 which is about a quarter life-size. Doesn’t sound like much but when you’re shooting with a D-SLR, this value increases (think crop factor and megapixels). Oh, and with the 77mm filter thread, you can slap on a Canon 500D achromatic close-up lens for an even larger magnification! According to Ricardo Polini the ratio should be about 1:1.1 on a Nikon D100.

FIELD TEST:
AF on this lens is fast. Not as fast as the 70-200mm f/2.8G, probably due to its smaller maximum aperture, but adequately quick and silent. The AF motor does exhibit some slight “chattering” once in a while.

The manual override AF feature of this AF-S lens is a great plus especially when you want to fine-tune where you want your focus to be on. On occasion, the AF sensor on your camera can be tricked, but with a slight twist of the AF ring, the focus can be adjusted without having to flip the MF switch. Unfortunately, this lens doesn’t have AF-lock buttons on its barrel like its more expensive f/2.8 relatives..

Images produced by this lens are very sharp and contrasty. I’m very satisfied with the pictures produced taken by this lens, which are very well saturated and pop-out at you. The results are on par and often exceed what I’m used to getting on the 70-200mm f/2.8G. Other reviews suggest that it is almost as good as its 300mm f/2.8 AFS brothers.

This lens is also extremely versatile, being handy for real tightly cropped portraits down to tack sharp macros. Many associate lenses this range for sports, but I’ve found that given its features, so much more can be achieved.

Teleconverters:
This lens is only compatible with teleconverters that are compatible with Nikon AF-S lenses like the TC20E, TC14E (I & II) and the TC17E II. However, due to the limitations to the focusing and maximum aperture, it is recommended that you use only the TC14E (I & II) and the TC17E II teleconverters. For each teleconverter your settings change as follows:

i)TC 14EII:
Focal Length – 420mm
Maximum Aperture: f/5.6

ii)TC 17EII:
Focal Length - 510mm
Maximum Aperture - f/6.8

I have only used this lens with the TC17E II. AF speed slows considerably, but the image quality is still top notch. Users of the TC14E have reported that there is almost no loss of image quality when the 300mm f/4 AFS is coupled with the TC14E.

The TC14E and the TC14E II are both optically similar. The only difference is the finishing in which the TC14E II has Nikon’s “Simulated Leather” finish to match the newer lenses (namely the 70-200mm f/2.8G) better.

You can also read this review HERE (http://www.pbase.com/mikench/300mm_f4_afs).


©Michael Ng 2005

http://i.pbase.com/v3/82/590082/1/49758679.DSC_6306.jpg

http://i.pbase.com/v3/82/590082/1/49758683.DSC_6433.jpg

asmd
25-09-2005, 03:37 PM
very nice mikench..
.... eye twitching already....

regards,
asmd.

dlcmh
25-09-2005, 04:59 PM
Great, great review! I've linked it up at:
http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/nikon_lenses (#1)

Thanks!

digitalartist
25-09-2005, 07:57 PM
Good article. Well done. Hope more people will do similar write ups of their equipment. I'm moving it to the article section so that it doesn't get lost too quickly...

david.tan
25-09-2005, 08:17 PM
Good one MIKE ! its much more helpful !

keep up the good work and keep em coming !

hmm... saw ur pbase be4, maybe u should do a review and compare about 80-200 lens, three of them :P

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

noordin
25-09-2005, 08:56 PM
Very good article! Thanks. :thumbsup:

mikench
25-09-2005, 09:19 PM
Thanks for the encouragement guys. Cant beat Thom or Bjorn, but I'm getting there. Hahaha....

I'm already working on a review on the Nikkor 16mm f/2.8D fisheye.

Keeping fingers crossed ;)

clementc
25-09-2005, 10:30 PM
How much damage to one's pocket? hehe very important fact ...

ted
25-09-2005, 11:07 PM
hmm, perhaps i can tumpang this article by posting a motocross pix taken with a D70 and 300mm f/4 combo. lemme look for it first ya?

mikench
26-09-2005, 12:55 AM
Originally posted by Davidnikon@Sep 25 2005, 08:17 PM
Good one MIKE ! its much more helpful !

keep up the good work and keep em coming !

hmm... saw ur pbase be4, maybe u should do a review and compare about 80-200 lens, three of them :P

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
I've already sold my 80-200mm lenses quite a while ago. I cant afford to keep duplicates of the same focal lenght! So I'm left with just my 70-200mm which gets the job done.

mikench
26-09-2005, 12:57 AM
Originally posted by clementc@Sep 25 2005, 10:30 PM
How much damage to one's pocket? hehe very important fact ...
I got mine used for US$710.

They go for around US$1k brand new. I got a real good deal.
Buy second hand lar....just as good as new. And the money you save can go to other pieces of glass :) *drool*

mikench
26-09-2005, 06:00 AM
Added note on using Teleconverters with this lens.

seethoe
26-09-2005, 09:14 AM
wow! Nice review mike... now u got me excited over the 300mm...

tsechien
26-09-2005, 10:14 AM
Who says gear talk is boring?

hehehehe Nice one Mike - good writeup and has certainly got a-thinking on a AF-AFS upgrade.

chien

Initiald
26-09-2005, 11:25 AM
Originally posted by mikench@Sep 25 2005, 01:04 PM
The TC14E and the TC14E II are both optically similar. The only difference is the finishing in which the TC14E II has Nikon’s “Simulated Leather” finish to match the newer lenses (namely the 70-200mm f/2.8G) better.
Thanks Mike for the review. Very timely indeed. I see you're enjoying the lens. :nodyes:

One correction... I believe there are more differences in the TC-14E and TC-14E II teleconverter. There is a tab on the TC-14 E II that "prevents" you from using it on the older AF lenses. The tab can be manually filed off if needed though. :hammer:

mikench
26-09-2005, 12:12 PM
Originally posted by Initiald@Sep 26 2005, 11:25 AM
Thanks Mike for the review. Very timely indeed. I see you're enjoying the lens. :nodyes:

One correction... I believe there are more differences in the TC-14E and TC-14E II teleconverter. There is a tab on the TC-14 E II that "prevents" you from using it on the older AF lenses. The tab can be manually filed off if needed though. :hammer:
Where did you get your information?
These teleconverters werent made to work with regular AF-D lenses. Only AF-S and AF-I lenses. According to this site:

http://nikonpages.heymanphotography.com/tcmod/

The tabs are evident in both version I and II teleconverters.

Another consideration about using lenses with teleconverters is minding how far the rear element moves back. Wideangle lenses especially have this problem where the rear element smacks into the TC's front element. *ouch*

Initiald
26-09-2005, 12:20 PM
Originally posted by mikench@Sep 26 2005, 12:12 PM
Where did you get your information?
Ooophs, my bad. You're right. The tabs are evident in both versions I and II teleconverters. ;)

But to make them work on AF-D lenses, you can grind them if I'm not mistaken. It's on the teleconverter table compiled by Nikonians org. A link which you gave earlier.

mikench
26-09-2005, 01:17 PM
Originally posted by tsechien@Sep 26 2005, 10:14 AM
Who says gear talk is boring?

hehehehe Nice one Mike - good writeup and has certainly got a-thinking on a AF-AFS upgrade.

chien
Hehe...

Which one? The 80-200mm or the 300mm f/4? Or BOTH?

tsechien
26-09-2005, 02:15 PM
Originally posted by mikench@Sep 26 2005, 01:17 PM
Hehe...

Which one? The 80-200mm or the 300mm f/4? Or BOTH?
BOTH!!! BOTH!!!

chien

sharpshooter
26-09-2005, 04:00 PM
Thanks for the article mike!

At least even though I don't use Nikkor lenses (or Nikon for that matter) it's a good guage and template of how I can judge my next lens buy...

:thumbsup:

ted
27-09-2005, 12:18 AM
Originally posted by tsechien@Sep 26 2005, 02:15 PM
BOTH!!! BOTH!!!

chien
Concurs.

:lol: :lol: :pimpin_ted: :lol: :lol:

mikench
18-11-2005, 12:00 PM
Here's a little known fact:

When using the 300mm f/4 AFS, you can use your built-in speedlight on your camera body for extra illumination without the lens getting in the way. It's stated in the manual. I tried it and it's true.
COOL!