Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Theory vs Practical

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Theory vs Practical

    I've read a lot, in fact I prepared a lot to shoot landscape outdoor. One of the thing I wanted to try so much is the 'milky' effect.
    Basically, this is how I work it out, longer shutter speed then adjust the ISO and aperture to balance the photo. Of course with a tripod. But since the sky is a bit cloudy, I think I can shoot without any filter.

    After a few shot, I realize it's overexposed, I put in a ND8 filter and with f22 and ISO 100, I manage to get 1" of shutter speed. Yet, the 'milky' effect is not obvious. I even attach a CPL on ND8 to further reduce the light getting into the camera sensor (correct me if this method don't work) and somehow I manage to get 1.3" of shutter speed, but it doesn't work well too cause with CPL you kind of see thru into the water, so the wavy is transparent and somehow 'milky' effect is gone.

    I sit there thinking for a while, in the end I blame it to my ND8 filter, a 3 stop is not strong enough? Do it need a strong wave for milky effect? Or will it be different if I adjust the exposure compensation (only think of that after reach home)?

    In the end, I give up trying for that 'milky' effect today! Help please sifu!





  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bangi
    Posts
    59
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    I never shot with the ND or CPL filter, since CPL cuts through the water, so, dont use the CPL and use more stop ND filter

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Too many places
    Posts
    12,537
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 77 Times in 66 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    You need to stop the light more and hence an ND400 (9/10 stops) filter is required for what you desire. This too will allow you to settle for a more convenient aperture such as f/11 to get a good trade off on depth of field and sharpness at the same time. Do realize that creamy water alone will not make the picture, composition and light need to be present to get the best out of it.
    http://www.loveanda35.com | re-styled!
    http://loveanda35.tumblr.com | less serious photography from life on the road
    Instagram | loveanda35

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Negeri Sembilan
    Posts
    5,981
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    A CPL will cut around 1.5 - 2 stops. Lets make it 2 stops to be safe.

    So your exposure should be around 4 seconds.
    http://danishfairoz.blogspot.com/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    3,416
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    According to what you said, you're probably shooting in very bright light, hence you couldn't get a longer shutter speed. Try shooting in the evening. Understand the limitations of equipment and light.

    Regards, Ralverd
    www.Ray-Lim.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    If it was a very bright light, then I know what's goes wrong. But it was a cloudy day and yet most of my shots were overexposed.
    ND8 is a 3 stops, and CPL is a 2?
    Then it would be 5 stops right, 4 sec won't be a problem, but anything more than 2 already white screen. Haih...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Penang
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    a picture from the shooting might help some of us to give u better advice

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Too many places
    Posts
    12,537
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 77 Times in 66 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    Quote Originally Posted by fantagero View Post
    a picture from the shooting might help some of us to give u better advice
    He managed to get a 1 second shutter speed out of it which is still too fast to create the effect and the above comments tell how to further slow down the shutter speed. What is it that you don't understand and need a picture for?

    Below image was shot a bit over 20 seconds, if the wind is strong enough you get the clouds streaking effect along with the water effect. Shooting this with a 1 second shutter speed will not be slow enough to get anything near this result.

    I shot some waterscapes again in Penang last week and can have already a similar effect like the above with a shutter speed around 8 seconds.

    _DSC2592 - 5.jpg
    http://www.loveanda35.com | re-styled!
    http://loveanda35.tumblr.com | less serious photography from life on the road
    Instagram | loveanda35

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Penang
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    Quote Originally Posted by pointblank View Post
    He managed to get a 1 second shutter speed out of it which is still too fast to create the effect and the above comments tell how to further slow down the shutter speed. What is it that you don't understand and need a picture for?

    _DSC2592 - 5.jpg
    As i said, a picture will help some of us give a better advice.

    and what's wrong with suggesting posting the picture in case? it usually helps to understand more of the difficulties.
    probably the location not very suitable to do long exposure, IE, mild river vs waterfall current vs beach
    probably the time is not suitable,

    anyway, threadstarter, the longer the shutter, the milkier the effect, but dont overdo it
    how to get longer exposure without overexposing the picture, timing.
    if you do it in the mid day, you probably should just get in the water and swim, wait for the golden hour.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    Golden hour is the best time to shoot, I see. What is the golden hour in M'sia generally?



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    620
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    TS, if you are struggling to get images in the correct exposure, then your Theory is still not enough.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Too many places
    Posts
    12,537
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 77 Times in 66 Posts

    Re: Theory vs Practical

    Quote Originally Posted by ShrugsLova View Post
    Golden hour is the best time to shoot, I see. What is the golden hour in M'sia generally?
    Are you living here? It's everyday troughout the year between 7 and 8.
    http://www.loveanda35.com | re-styled!
    http://loveanda35.tumblr.com | less serious photography from life on the road
    Instagram | loveanda35

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. outing theory
    By thewarnela in forum Newbies Corner
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-03-2010, 01:39 PM
  2. Photography Rule /Theory /Technique
    By andell in forum General Showcase
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-03-2009, 03:51 PM
  3. Did you agree this mathematical theory?
    By alanchin in forum Corner Café
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10-09-2008, 12:57 AM
  4. Conspiracy Theory
    By eugene in forum Corner Café
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-11-2004, 12:05 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •