hi guys, if anyone in Penang bought the VC version & doesn't have non-VC version (well... who would want to have both X D) & is interested to do some side-by-side comparison tests, I will be very glad to sponsor (because also want to know exactly what improvements to expect from the new version hehe, especially bokeh wise )
Canon mount anyway, thanks
I have already posted a review at:
Doc, what is the delivery period of this lens for Canon mount if ordered online from Shashinki?
The level of sharpnest looks so good so far, many thanks for the review,
@Khoking, might I know which camera have you used for this test?
So 17-50 non-VC has sharper image comparing to 17-50 VC?
Isn't it better to get the VC rathat than non VC ?
I am going for this Len with VC soon....
Just go for the VC if u have extra money..
I'm one of the satisfied user..
is the difference between VC and non-VC that big?
Review from one of the site on this lens
if this lens compare to new 18-55 kits, which one better in term of sharpness and color accurate
I was thinking of buying body with tamron instead of the canon kit
Non VC gives slightly sharper image than VC, but if you hv a v powerful body you can go for non vc...save more $
Hi, can i know by powerful body, do u mean a D300s compared to D5000?
Thanks for the comparison info
Chance upon this and would like to check if my 'feeling' is correct. I compare my 17-50 non cc with my Nikon AFD 50 f1.8, somehow the sharpness is never near the Nikon lens. Is it true or just my imagination?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)